Four mistakes we still make on a new audit, and the check we added to the process after each one.

Sixty-two audits in, the method is stable but the failure modes are not gone. These are the four that recur, and what we changed to catch them earlier.
The team points at the workflow that generates complaints, and it is rarely the one that costs the most hours. We now time every workflow before ranking any of them, and only then look at what people flagged.
It describes what should happen. On a first audit we once mapped six steps that nobody had performed in two years. The check is simple: nothing enters the map unless we have watched it happen.
Ninety percent of a workflow is easy to see in ten days. The ten percent that decides where the handoff rule sits lives in a person’s head, and it comes out only when you ask what the weirdest case last month was.
Ninety minutes is enough to walk the plan and not enough to argue about it. We now book two sessions, and the second one is where the build order actually gets decided.
Two weeks watching the real work, with the eval suite written before anything ships.
Two weeks. If we can’t find 500 hours a year to return, it’s free.
hello@agentiq.studio
+1 (415) 555-0138
410 Fremont Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA